Skip to main content

Should I Pay for an App?


Image Source; www.techcrunch.com
Should software developers or anyone working on similar fields pay for the "Apps" they use? Legally speaking, if the software is for a price, anyone who intends to use it must buy the software. Of course we all know this is never a common reality. I will not go into discussing  corporate  non sense and go into details of complicated licensing schemes being offered by , often times, greedy software companies. Let's focus into what they call,  the "Apps". These  simple yet entertaining and(sometimes)  useful software has kicked off to become a worldwide commodity, thanks to the ever expanding smart phone industry. Unlike big productivity suites offered by large money-sucking companies, most of these "apps" are startups trying to make a name in the industry. Of course we know some who went on and hit big time with a highly addictive app. Others were eventually bought by bigger companies. That's the idea of a food chain after all.  But then again, these are applications made perhaps on someone elses basement or a shitty small office by developers trying to earn some cash by doing what they do best. In reality, they are us, they work like us, they live like us, typical software developers. Like us, they deserve to be paid as well.

I dont mind spending a few dimes and nickels for a useful app. I have done it in iTunes before, buying a $15 iTunes gift card just to buy a $2.99 guitar app. Then, I went on buying some til I bolted out of iTunes and left a $7.99 fortune waitng to be spent. I also bought a few in the Play Store. I must admit, however, that I have not bought anything above 5$ mark. Sygic, is really tempting I must admit:-)
 
Going back to the question, I think out of respect to other software developers, we should pay for the apps that we think we need. That is why our clients continue to pay for the services and product we provide them, because the payment is due to us. The emergence of mobile applications has opened  the doors to a lot of developers. Mind you, most of these applications in the market don't earn that much. We can not blame them for the ugly advertisements that come with their masterpiece, especially if that is the only way they will cash in some money. So if the vast amount of free apps can't satisfy your need and only a paid app will do, be kind enough and pay. Just don't forget to evaluate first before buying.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hiding Unwanted Python Folders and Files in Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code is a universal editor and pretty good at it. However, the explorer view maybe cluttered with the automatically generated folders and files confusing developers. Python is no different. Below are example files and folders generated by Python.

The __pycache__ folder and *.pyc files  are totally unnecessary to the developer. To hide these files from the explorer view, we need to edit the settings.json for VSCode. Add the folder and the files as shown below:
Copy and paste the lines below :

"**/*.pyc":{"when":"$(basename).py"},"**/__pycache__":true

Getting Started with Stateless : A Lightweight Workflow Library Alternative for .NET

A year ago, I was looking for a simple workflow manager for a project I was working. Its a medium sized application that involves tracking the state of assets in the system. Back in 2008, Microsoft (MS) introduced new technologies along with the release of Visual Studio 2008: Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Communication Foundation (WCF), and Windows Workflow Foundation(WF). Having worked in a company utilizing mostly MS products for development, my first option was to go with WF. After doing some time reading and studying the library, I paused and decided it was too complex for my requirement. Using WF would be an overkill and the fact that it has, a rather, steep learning curve, there has to be another option. My mind toyed with the idea of developing a simple workflow library myself. It would be a learning experience but it might end up consuming a lot of time.

Why reinvent the wheel? So I started querying the internet for a better solution. I stumbled upon Stateless

Get Started with MongoDB Stitch : The New Backend As Service Offering from MongoDB

Halfway of this year, the guys from MongoDB launch their new backend as service product called MongoDB Stitch. While the launch is just for the beta, the promise of the service is quite interesting. MongoDB has been around for long now and some development stacks have been based on its database product, the MongoDB-ExpressJS-Angular-NodeJS (MEAN) and the MongoDB-ExpressJS-React-NodeJS (MERN) stacks to name a few. These stacks, however, relies on backend technology such as ExpressJS and NodeJS. The idea of provisioning servers and developing the backend solution makes it daunting for small to medium scale applications. MongoDB Atlas, at least made life much easier by providing on cloud database solution, but there must be a simpler solution, right? A solution the would stitch the backend and frontend together ( see what I did there ?).
MongoDB Stitch lets developers focus on building applications rather than on managing data manipulation code, service integration, or backend infrastruct…